Monetary Stakes and Socioeconomic Characteristics in Ultimatum Games: An Experiment with Nation-Wide Representative Subjects
نویسنده
چکیده
Games: An Experiment with Nation-Wide Representative Subjects Tsu-Tan Fu Center for Survey Research and Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei 115, Taiwan Wei-Hsin Kong Institute of Industrial Economics, National Central University C.C. Yang* Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Nankang, Taipei 115, Taiwan Department of Public Finance, National Chengchi University, Wenshan, Taipei 116, Taiwan June 2007 [Abstract] We conduct an experiment on ultimatum games with subjects who are representative of a nation. Our focus is on the size effect of monetary stakes when experimental subjects are “real” people rather than students as in previous studies. It is found that: (i) raising stakes substantially reduce the number of “outliners” in both offers and rejections; (ii) higher stakes exert a significant impact on players’ offer and rejection behavior as the standard economic theory predicts even for inexperienced or one-shot play; (iii) socioeconomic characteristics dominate responders’ behavior when stakes are low, whereas monetary stakes dominates responders’ behavior when stakes are high; (iv) age has a lifecycle effect on players’ behavior when stakes are low: those subjects who are young and old offer less and reject less often than those who are in the middle age; and (v) women reject less often than men, but there is no gender difference in offer behavior.
منابع مشابه
How Much Is Our Fairness Worth? The Effect of Raising Stakes on Offers by Proposers and Minimum Acceptable Offers in Dictator and Ultimatum Games
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine whether people respond differently to low and high stakes in Dictator and Ultimatum Games. We assumed that if we raised the stakes high enough, we would observe more self-orientated behavior because fairness would become too costly, in spite of a possible risk of a higher punishment. METHODS A questionnaire was completed by a sample of 524 uni...
متن کاملQuantal-response equilibrium models of the ultimatum bargaining game
This paper investigates the implications of normaland extensive-form quantal response equilibrium (QRE) models (McKelvey and Palfrey, 1995, Games and Economic Behavior; 1998, Experimental Economics) in the ultimatum bargaining game, assuming that players maximize expected monetary payo ̄ s. It is shown that normal-form QRE can select a non-sequential equilibrium, and that the selection depends c...
متن کاملAn Experimental Study of Incentive Reversal in Sequential and Simultaneous Games
I t is commonly held that increasing monetary rewards enhance work effort. This study, however, argues that this will not ineludibly occur in team activities. Incentive Reversal may occur in sequential team productions featuring positive external impacts on agents. This seemingly paradoxical event is explained through two experiments in this article. The first experiment involves a sample ...
متن کاملUsing crowdsourced online experiments to study context-dependency of behavior.
We use Mechanical Turk's diverse participant pool to conduct online bargaining games in India and the US. First, we assess internal validity of crowdsourced experimentation through variation of stakes ($0, $1, $4, and $10) in the Ultimatum and Dictator Game. For cross-country equivalence we adjust the stakes following differences in purchasing power. Our marginal totals correspond closely to la...
متن کاملThe role of envy in ultimatum games *
The behaviour of subjects in ultimatum bargaining experiments is very different from that predicted by standard theory. These ‘anomalies’ are frequently explained by fairness considerations. In this paper we consider the possibility that the subjects are simply envious. We derive the implications of envy for the behaviour in ultimatum games and it will be shown that envy is a potential explanat...
متن کامل